Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 0f4e54c6 authored by Mark Brown's avatar Mark Brown Committed by Kukjin Kim
Browse files

ARM: S3C64XX: Fix SoC identification for S3C64xx devices


The IS_SAMSUNG_CPU() macro works by comparing the CPU ID mask exactly with
the CPU ID. This was failing for S3C64xx SoCs as in order to support
identification of the exact device the mask covers both variants of the
chip, meaning that the test would always fail on S3C6410 devices. This in
turn caused the core GPIO subsystem to fail to identify the CPU and not
support any GPIOs, crippling the system.

As a minimally invasive fix change the test for the class to be done by
checking each implementation and oring them together.

Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
parent ec4f5423
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ extern unsigned long samsung_cpu_id;
#define S3C6400_CPU_ID 0x36400000
#define S3C6410_CPU_ID 0x36410000
#define S3C64XX_CPU_ID (S3C6400_CPU_ID & S3C6410_CPU_ID)
#define S3C64XX_CPU_MASK 0xFFFFF000
#define S5P6440_CPU_ID 0x56440000
......@@ -50,7 +49,8 @@ static inline int is_samsung_##name(void) \
}
IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(s3c24xx, S3C24XX_CPU_ID, S3C24XX_CPU_MASK)
IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(s3c64xx, S3C64XX_CPU_ID, S3C64XX_CPU_MASK)
IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(s3c6400, S3C6400_CPU_ID, S3C64XX_CPU_MASK)
IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(s3c6410, S3C6410_CPU_ID, S3C64XX_CPU_MASK)
IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(s5p6440, S5P6440_CPU_ID, S5P64XX_CPU_MASK)
IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(s5p6450, S5P6450_CPU_ID, S5P64XX_CPU_MASK)
IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(s5pc100, S5PC100_CPU_ID, S5PC100_CPU_MASK)
......@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ IS_SAMSUNG_CPU(exynos4412, EXYNOS4412_CPU_ID, EXYNOS4_CPU_MASK)
#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_S3C6400) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_S3C6410)
# define soc_is_s3c64xx() is_samsung_s3c64xx()
# define soc_is_s3c64xx() (is_samsung_s3c6400() || is_samsung_s3c6410())
#else
# define soc_is_s3c64xx() 0
#endif
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment