+3
−5
+5
−4
Loading
Lockdep complains about use of the iolock in inode reclaim context because it doesn't understand that reclaim has the last reference to the inode, and thus an iolock->reclaim->iolock deadlock is not possible. The iolock is technically not necessary in xfs_inactive() and was only added to appease an assert in xfs_free_eofblocks(), which can be called from other non-reclaim contexts. Therefore, just kill the assert and drop the use of the iolock from reclaim context to quiet lockdep. Signed-off-by:Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>