Commit 7de3e650 authored by Alex Elder's avatar Alex Elder Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
Browse files

greybus: ENODEV can be an expected error too



When probing for i2c devices, a read transfer operation can be used.
In this case, it is expected that some devices will not be found, so
ENODEV is an expected failure.  Don't issue a warning if the return
value is -ENODEV.

Note:  I anticipate we might have to be more precise in identifying
this specific case, but for now this eliminates a bogus warning when
probing i2c devices.

Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
parent aa26351d
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+9 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -276,6 +276,14 @@ static void gb_i2c_transfer_response(struct i2c_msg *msgs, u32 msg_count,
	}
}

/*
 * Some i2c transfer operations return results that are expected.
 */
static bool gb_i2c_expected_transfer_error(int errno)
{
	return errno == -EAGAIN || errno == -ENODEV;
}

static int gb_i2c_transfer_operation(struct gb_i2c_device *gb_i2c_dev,
					struct i2c_msg *msgs, u32 msg_count)
{
@@ -294,7 +302,7 @@ static int gb_i2c_transfer_operation(struct gb_i2c_device *gb_i2c_dev,
		response = operation->response->payload;
		gb_i2c_transfer_response(msgs, msg_count, response);
		ret = msg_count;
	} else if (ret != -EAGAIN) {
	} else if (!gb_i2c_expected_transfer_error(ret)) {
		pr_err("transfer operation failed (%d)\n", ret);
	}
	gb_operation_destroy(operation);