Skip to content
Commit c61bcebd authored by Maciej Fijalkowski's avatar Maciej Fijalkowski Committed by Daniel Borkmann
Browse files

ice: Prepare legacy-rx for upcoming XDP multi-buffer support



Rx path is going to be modified in a way that fragmented frame will be
gathered within xdp_buff in the first place. This approach implies that
underlying buffer has to provide tailroom for skb_shared_info. This is
currently the case when ring uses build_skb but not when legacy-rx knob
is turned on. This case configures 2k Rx buffers and has no way to
provide either headroom or tailroom - FWIW it currently has
XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM which is broken and in here it is removed. 2k Rx
buffers were used so driver in this setting was able to support 9k MTU
as it can chain up to 5 Rx buffers. With offset configuring HW writing
2k of a data was passing the half of the page which broke the assumption
of our internal page recycling tricks.

Now if above got fixed and legacy-rx path would be left as is, when
referring to skb_shared_info via xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(),
packet's content would be corrupted again. Hence size of Rx buffer needs
to be lowered and therefore supported MTU. This operation will allow us
to keep the unified data path and with 8k MTU users (if any of
legacy-rx) would still be good to go. However, tendency is to drop the
support for this code path at some point.

Add ICE_RXBUF_1664 as vsi::rx_buf_len and ICE_MAX_FRAME_LEGACY_RX (8320)
as vsi::max_frame for legacy-rx. For bigger page sizes configure 3k Rx
buffers, not 2k.

Since headroom support is removed, disable data_meta support on legacy-rx.
When preparing XDP buff, rely on ice_rx_ring::rx_offset setting when
deciding whether to support data_meta or not.

Signed-off-by: default avatarMaciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAlexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230131204506.219292-2-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com
parent c1a3daf7
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment