selftests/seccomp: Compare bitmap vs filter overhead

As part of the seccomp benchmarking, include the expectations with
regard to the timing behavior of the constant action bitmaps, and report
inconsistencies better.

Example output with constant action bitmaps on x86:

$ sudo ./seccomp_benchmark 100000000
Current BPF sysctl settings:
net.core.bpf_jit_enable = 1
net.core.bpf_jit_harden = 0
Benchmarking 200000000 syscalls...
129.359381409 - 0.008724424 = 129350656985 (129.4s)
getpid native: 646 ns
264.385890006 - 129.360453229 = 135025436777 (135.0s)
getpid RET_ALLOW 1 filter (bitmap): 675 ns
399.400511893 - 264.387045901 = 135013465992 (135.0s)
getpid RET_ALLOW 2 filters (bitmap): 675 ns
545.872866260 - 399.401718327 = 146471147933 (146.5s)
getpid RET_ALLOW 3 filters (full): 732 ns
696.337101319 - 545.874097681 = 150463003638 (150.5s)
getpid RET_ALLOW 4 filters (full): 752 ns
Estimated total seccomp overhead for 1 bitmapped filter: 29 ns
Estimated total seccomp overhead for 2 bitmapped filters: 29 ns
Estimated total seccomp overhead for 3 full filters: 86 ns
Estimated total seccomp overhead for 4 full filters: 106 ns
Estimated seccomp entry overhead: 29 ns
Estimated seccomp per-filter overhead (last 2 diff): 20 ns
Estimated seccomp per-filter overhead (filters / 4): 19 ns
Expectations:
	native ≤ 1 bitmap (646 ≤ 675): ✔️
	native ≤ 1 filter (646 ≤ 732): ✔️
	per-filter (last 2 diff) ≈ per-filter (filters / 4) (20 ≈ 19): ✔️
	1 bitmapped ≈ 2 bitmapped (29 ≈ 29): ✔️
	entry ≈ 1 bitmapped (29 ≈ 29): ✔️
	entry ≈ 2 bitmapped (29 ≈ 29): ✔️
	native + entry + (per filter * 4) ≈ 4 filters total (755 ≈ 752): ✔️



[YiFei: Changed commit message to show stats for this patch series]
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1b61df3db85c5f7f1b9202722c45e7b39df73ef2.1602431034.git.yifeifz2@illinois.edu