Skip to content
Commit 3d9f773c authored by David Miller's avatar David Miller Committed by Alexei Starovoitov
Browse files

bpf: Use bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() at simple call sites.



All of these cases are strictly of the form:

	preempt_disable();
	BPF_PROG_RUN(...);
	preempt_enable();

Replace this with bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() which wraps BPF_PROG_RUN()
with:

	migrate_disable();
	BPF_PROG_RUN(...);
	migrate_enable();

On non RT enabled kernels this maps to preempt_disable/enable() and on RT
enabled kernels this solely prevents migration, which is sufficient as
there is no requirement to prevent reentrancy to any BPF program from a
preempting task. The only requirement is that the program stays on the same
CPU.

Therefore, this is a trivially correct transformation.

The seccomp loop does not need protection over the loop. It only needs
protection per BPF filter program

[ tglx: Converted to bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() ]

Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200224145643.691493094@linutronix.de
parent 37e1d920
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment