x86: Use absent_pages_in_range() instead of memblock_x86_hole_size()
memblock_x86_hole_size() calculates the total size of holes in a given range according to memblock and is used by numa emulation code and numa_meminfo_cover_memory(). Since conversion to MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP, absent_pages_in_range() also uses memblock and gives the same result. This patch replaces memblock_x86_hole_size() uses with absent_pages_in_range(). After the conversion the x86 function doesn't have any user left and is killed. Signed-off-by:Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310462166-31469-12-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by:
H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Showing
- arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h 0 additions, 2 deletionsarch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
- arch/x86/mm/memblock.c 0 additions, 52 deletionsarch/x86/mm/memblock.c
- arch/x86/mm/numa.c 2 additions, 2 deletionsarch/x86/mm/numa.c
- arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c 18 additions, 12 deletionsarch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment