intel-iommu: Introduce first_pte_in_page() to simplify PTE-setting loops

On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 16:59 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I also _really_ hate how you do
>
>         (unsigned long)pte >> VTD_PAGE_SHIFT ==
>         (unsigned long)first_pte >> VTD_PAGE_SHIFT

Kill this, in favour of just looking to see if the incremented pte
pointer has 'wrapped' onto the next page. Which means we have to check
it _after_ incrementing it, not before.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>