Skip to content
Commit a93c3835 authored by Ahmed S. Darwish's avatar Ahmed S. Darwish Committed by Martin K. Petersen
Browse files

scsi: qla4xxx: Remove in_interrupt()

qla4_82xx_crb_win_lock() spins on a certain hardware state until it's
updated. At the end of each spin, if in_interrupt() is true, it does 20
loops of cpu_relax(). Otherwise, it yields the CPU.

The in_interrupt() macro is ill-defined as it does not provide what the
name suggests, and it does not catch the intended use-case here.

qla4_82xx_crb_win_lock() is always invoked with scsi_qla_host::hw_lock
acquired, with disabled interrupts. If the caller is in process context, as
in qla4_82xx_need_reset_handler(), then in_interrupt() will return false
even though it is not allowed to call schedule().

Remove the in_interrupt() check.

Change qla4_82xx_crb_win_lock() specification to a purely atomic
function. Mark it as static, remove its forward declaration, and move it
above its callers. To avoid hammering the PCI bus while spinning, use a 10
micro-second delay instead of cpu_relax().

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126132952.2287996-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de


Fixes: f4f5df23 ("[SCSI] qla4xxx: Added support for ISP82XX")
Cc: Nilesh Javali <njavali@marvell.com>
Cc: Manish Rangankar <mrangankar@marvell.com>
Cc: <GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@marvell.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDaniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAhmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
parent 18577cdc
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment