- Jul 13, 2020
-
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Make sure we specify the layout segment range when calculating the mirror count. In theory, that number could depend on the range to which we're writing. Signed-off-by:
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
Both nfs_pageio_reset_read_mds() and nfs_pageio_reset_write_mds() do call pnfs_generic_pg_cleanup() for us. Signed-off-by:
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
Trond Myklebust authored
If the application uses the AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC flag after doing readdir(), then we should still mark the parent inode as seeing a readdirplus hit. That ensures that we continue to use readdirplus in the 'ls -l' type of workflow to do fast lookups of the dentries. Signed-off-by:
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
- Jul 12, 2020
-
-
Pavel Begunkov authored
59960b9d ("io_uring: fix lazy work init") tried to fix missing io_req_init_async(), but left out work.flags and hash. Do it earlier. Fixes: 7cdaf587 ("io_uring: avoid whole io_wq_work copy for requests completed inline") Signed-off-by:
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Pavel Begunkov authored
Ensure to set msg.msg_name for the async portion of send/recvmsg, as the header copy will copy to/from it. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.5+ Signed-off-by:
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
- Jul 10, 2020
-
-
Jens Axboe authored
We currently account the memory after the exit work has been run, but that leaves a gap where a process has closed its ring and until the memory has been accounted as freed. If the memlocked ulimit is borderline, then that can introduce spurious setup errors returning -ENOMEM because the free work hasn't been run yet. Account this as freed when we close the ring, as not to expose a tiny gap where setting up a new ring can fail. Fixes: 85faa7b8 ("io_uring: punt final io_ring_ctx wait-and-free to workqueue") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7 Signed-off-by:
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Yang Yingliang authored
I got a memleak report when doing some fuzz test: BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0x607eeac06e78 (size 8): comm "test", pid 295, jiffies 4294735835 (age 31.745s) hex dump (first 8 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ backtrace: [<00000000932632e6>] percpu_ref_init+0x2a/0x1b0 [<0000000092ddb796>] __io_uring_register+0x111d/0x22a0 [<00000000eadd6c77>] __x64_sys_io_uring_register+0x17b/0x480 [<00000000591b89a6>] do_syscall_64+0x56/0xa0 [<00000000864a281d>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Call percpu_ref_exit() on error path to avoid refcount memleak. Fixes: 05f3fb3c ("io_uring: avoid ring quiesce for fixed file set unregister and update") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by:
Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
- Jul 09, 2020
-
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
btrfs implements the iter_write op and thus can use the more efficient iov_iter based splice implementation. For now falling back to the less efficient default is pretty harmless, but I have a pending series that removes the default, and thus would cause btrfs to not support splice at all. Reported-by:
Andy Lavr <andy.lavr@gmail.com> Tested-by:
Andy Lavr <andy.lavr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
While debugging a patch that I wrote I was hitting use-after-free panics when accessing block groups on unmount. This turned out to be because in the nocow case if we bail out of doing the nocow for whatever reason we need to call btrfs_dec_nocow_writers() if we called the inc. This puts our block group, but a few error cases does if (nocow) { btrfs_dec_nocow_writers(); goto error; } unfortunately, error is error: if (nocow) btrfs_dec_nocow_writers(); so we get a double put on our block group. Fix this by dropping the error cases calling of btrfs_dec_nocow_writers(), as it's handled at the error label now. Fixes: 762bf098 ("btrfs: improve error handling in run_delalloc_nocow") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Steve French authored
To 2.28 Signed-off-by:
Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
-
Ronnie Sahlberg authored
Don't leak a reference to tlink during the NOTIFY ioctl Signed-off-by:
Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by:
Aurelien Aptel <aaptel@suse.com> CC: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.6+
-
Yang Yingliang authored
I got a memleak report when doing some fuzz test: BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff888113e02300 (size 488): comm "syz-executor401", pid 356, jiffies 4294809529 (age 11.954s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ a0 a4 ce 19 81 88 ff ff 60 ce 09 0d 81 88 ff ff ........`....... backtrace: [<00000000129a84ec>] kmem_cache_zalloc include/linux/slab.h:659 [inline] [<00000000129a84ec>] __alloc_file+0x25/0x310 fs/file_table.c:101 [<000000003050ad84>] alloc_empty_file+0x4f/0x120 fs/file_table.c:151 [<000000004d0a41a3>] alloc_file+0x5e/0x550 fs/file_table.c:193 [<000000002cb242f0>] alloc_file_pseudo+0x16a/0x240 fs/file_table.c:233 [<00000000046a4baa>] anon_inode_getfile fs/anon_inodes.c:91 [inline] [<00000000046a4baa>] anon_inode_getfile+0xac/0x1c0 fs/anon_inodes.c:74 [<0000000035beb745>] __do_sys_perf_event_open+0xd4a/0x2680 kernel/events/core.c:11720 [<0000000049009dc7>] do_syscall_64+0x56/0xa0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:359 [<00000000353731ca>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff8881152dd5e0 (size 16): comm "syz-executor401", pid 356, jiffies 4294809529 (age 11.954s) hex dump (first 16 bytes): 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<0000000074caa794>] kmem_cache_zalloc include/linux/slab.h:659 [inline] [<0000000074caa794>] lsm_file_alloc security/security.c:567 [inline] [<0000000074caa794>] security_file_alloc+0x32/0x160 security/security.c:1440 [<00000000c6745ea3>] __alloc_file+0xba/0x310 fs/file_table.c:106 [<000000003050ad84>] alloc_empty_file+0x4f/0x120 fs/file_table.c:151 [<000000004d0a41a3>] alloc_file+0x5e/0x550 fs/file_table.c:193 [<000000002cb242f0>] alloc_file_pseudo+0x16a/0x240 fs/file_table.c:233 [<00000000046a4baa>] anon_inode_getfile fs/anon_inodes.c:91 [inline] [<00000000046a4baa>] anon_inode_getfile+0xac/0x1c0 fs/anon_inodes.c:74 [<0000000035beb745>] __do_sys_perf_event_open+0xd4a/0x2680 kernel/events/core.c:11720 [<0000000049009dc7>] do_syscall_64+0x56/0xa0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:359 [<00000000353731ca>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 If io_sqe_file_register() failed, we need put the file that get by fget() to avoid the memleak. Fixes: c3a31e60 ("io_uring: add support for IORING_REGISTER_FILES_UPDATE") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by:
Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
Xiaoguang Wang authored
For those applications which are not willing to use io_uring_enter() to reap and handle cqes, they may completely rely on liburing's io_uring_peek_cqe(), but if cq ring has overflowed, currently because io_uring_peek_cqe() is not aware of this overflow, it won't enter kernel to flush cqes, below test program can reveal this bug: static void test_cq_overflow(struct io_uring *ring) { struct io_uring_cqe *cqe; struct io_uring_sqe *sqe; int issued = 0; int ret = 0; do { sqe = io_uring_get_sqe(ring); if (!sqe) { fprintf(stderr, "get sqe failed\n"); break;; } ret = io_uring_submit(ring); if (ret <= 0) { if (ret != -EBUSY) fprintf(stderr, "sqe submit failed: %d\n", ret); break; } issued++; } while (ret > 0); assert(ret == -EBUSY); printf("issued requests: %d\n", issued); while (issued) { ret = io_uring_peek_cqe(ring, &cqe); if (ret) { if (ret != -EAGAIN) { fprintf(stderr, "peek completion failed: %s\n", strerror(ret)); break; } printf("left requets: %d\n", issued); continue; } io_uring_cqe_seen(ring, cqe); issued--; printf("left requets: %d\n", issued); } } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int ret; struct io_uring ring; ret = io_uring_queue_init(16, &ring, 0); if (ret) { fprintf(stderr, "ring setup failed: %d\n", ret); return 1; } test_cq_overflow(&ring); return 0; } To fix this issue, export cq overflow status to userspace by adding new IORING_SQ_CQ_OVERFLOW flag, then helper functions() in liburing, such as io_uring_peek_cqe, can be aware of this cq overflow and do flush accordingly. Signed-off-by:
Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by:
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
- Jul 08, 2020
-
-
Steve French authored
We should not be logging a warning repeatedly on change notify. CC: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.6+ Signed-off-by:
Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by:
Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Fold it into the two callers. Signed-off-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Consolidate the two in-kernel read helpers to make upcoming changes easier. The only difference are the missing call to rw_verify_area in kernel_read, and an access_ok check that doesn't make sense for kernel buffers to start with. Signed-off-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
This is the counterpart to __kernel_write, and skip the rw_verify_area call compared to kernel_read. Signed-off-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Fold it into the two callers. Signed-off-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Consolidate the two in-kernel write helpers to make upcoming changes easier. The only difference are the missing call to rw_verify_area in kernel_write, and an access_ok check that doesn't make sense for kernel buffers to start with. Signed-off-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Add a WARN_ON_ONCE if the file isn't actually open for write. This matches the check done in vfs_write, but actually warn warns as a kernel user calling write on a file not opened for writing is a pretty obvious programming error. Signed-off-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
This is a very special interface that skips sb_writes protection, and not used by modules anymore. Signed-off-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
While pipes don't really need sb_writers projection, __kernel_write is an interface better kept private, and the additional rw_verify_area does not hurt here. Signed-off-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by:
Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
__kernel_write doesn't take a sb_writers references, which we need here. Signed-off-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by:
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
yangerkun authored
The caller of cifs_posix_lock_set will do retry(like fcntl_setlk64->do_lock_file_wait) if we will wait for any file_lock. So the retry in cifs_poxis_lock_set seems duplicated, remove it to make a cleanup. Signed-off-by:
yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by:
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
- Jul 07, 2020
-
-
Steve French authored
read permission, not just read attributes permission, is required on the directory. See MS-SMB2 (protocol specification) section 3.3.5.19. Signed-off-by:
Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com> CC: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.6+ Reviewed-by:
Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@microsoft.com>
-
Andreas Gruenbacher authored
So far, gfs2 has taken the inode glocks inside the ->readpage and ->readahead address space operations. Since commit d4388340 ("fs: convert mpage_readpages to mpage_readahead"), gfs2_readahead is passed the pages to read ahead locked. With that, the current holder of the inode glock may be trying to lock one of those pages while gfs2_readahead is trying to take the inode glock, resulting in a deadlock. Fix that by moving the lock taking to the higher-level ->read_iter file and ->fault vm operations. This also gets rid of an ugly lock inversion workaround in gfs2_readpage. The cache consistency model of filesystems like gfs2 is such that if data is found in the page cache, the data is up to date and can be used without taking any filesystem locks. If a page is not cached, filesystem locks must be taken before populating the page cache. To avoid taking the inode glock when the data is already cached, gfs2_file_read_iter first tries to read the data with the IOCB_NOIO flag set. If that fails, the inode glock is taken and the operation is retried with the IOCB_NOIO flag cleared. Signed-off-by:
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] The following small test script can trigger ASSERT() at unmount time: mkfs.btrfs -f $dev mount $dev $mnt mount -o remount,discard=async $mnt umount $mnt The call trace: assertion failed: atomic_read(&block_group->count) == 1, in fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3431 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3204! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 4 PID: 10389 Comm: umount Tainted: G O 5.8.0-rc3-custom+ #68 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call Trace: btrfs_free_block_groups.cold+0x22/0x55 [btrfs] close_ctree+0x2cb/0x323 [btrfs] btrfs_put_super+0x15/0x17 [btrfs] generic_shutdown_super+0x72/0x110 kill_anon_super+0x18/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x30 [btrfs] deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0xa0 deactivate_super+0x40/0x50 cleanup_mnt+0x135/0x190 __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20 task_work_run+0x64/0xb0 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1bc/0x1c0 __syscall_return_slowpath+0x47/0x230 do_syscall_64+0x64/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 The code: ASSERT(atomic_read(&block_group->count) == 1); btrfs_put_block_group(block_group); [CAUSE] Obviously it's some btrfs_get_block_group() call doesn't get its put call. The offending btrfs_get_block_group() happens here: void btrfs_mark_bg_unused(struct btrfs_block_group *bg) { if (list_empty(&bg->bg_list)) { btrfs_get_block_group(bg); list_add_tail(&bg->bg_list, &fs_info->unused_bgs); } } So every call sites removing the block group from unused_bgs list should reduce the ref count of that block group. However for async discard, it didn't follow the call convention: void btrfs_discard_punt_unused_bgs_list(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) { list_for_each_entry_safe(block_group, next, &fs_info->unused_bgs, bg_list) { list_del_init(&block_group->bg_list); btrfs_discard_queue_work(&fs_info->discard_ctl, block_group); } } And in btrfs_discard_queue_work(), it doesn't call btrfs_put_block_group() either. [FIX] Fix the problem by reducing the reference count when we grab the block group from unused_bgs list. Reported-by:
Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> Fixes: 6e80d4f8 ("btrfs: handle empty block_group removal for async discard") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.6+ Tested-by:
Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- Jul 04, 2020
-
-
Jens Axboe authored
When switching to TWA_SIGNAL for task_work notifications, we also made any signal based condition in io_cqring_wait() return -ERESTARTSYS. This breaks applications that rely on using signals to abort someone waiting for events. Check if we have a signal pending because of queued task_work, and repeat the signal check once we've run the task_work. This provides a reliable way of telling the two apart. Additionally, only use TWA_SIGNAL if we are using an eventfd. If not, we don't have the dependency situation described in the original commit, and we can get by with just using TWA_RESUME like we previously did. Fixes: ce593a6c ("io_uring: use signal based task_work running") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7 Reported-by:
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Tested-by:
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Signed-off-by:
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
- Jul 03, 2020
-
-
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) authored
This error path returned directly instead of calling sysctl_head_finish(). Fixes: ef9d965b ("sysctl: reject gigantic reads/write to sysctl files") Signed-off-by:
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by:
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Bob Peterson authored
Before this patch, some gfs2 code locked the freeze glock with LM_FLAG_NOEXP (Do not freeze) flag, and some did not. We never want to freeze the freeze glock, so this patch makes it consistently use LM_FLAG_NOEXP always. Signed-off-by:
Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
-
Bob Peterson authored
Before this patch, the freeze code in gfs2 specified GL_NOCACHE in several places. That's wrong because we always want to know the state of whether the file system is frozen. There was also a problem with freeze/thaw transitioning the glock from frozen (EX) to thawed (SH) because gfs2 will normally grant glocks in EX to processes that request it in SH mode, unless GL_EXACT is specified. Therefore, the freeze/thaw code, which tried to reacquire the glock in SH mode would get the glock in EX mode, and miss the transition from EX to SH. That made it think the thaw had completed normally, but since the glock was still cached in EX, other nodes could not freeze again. This patch removes the GL_NOCACHE flag to allow the freeze glock to be cached. It also adds the GL_EXACT flag so the glock is fully transitioned from EX to SH, thereby allowing future freeze operations. Signed-off-by:
Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
-
Bob Peterson authored
Before this patch, only read-write mounts would grab the freeze glock in read-only mode, as part of gfs2_make_fs_rw. So the freeze glock was never initialized. That meant requests to freeze, which request the glock in EX, were granted without any state transition. That meant you could mount a gfs2 file system, which is currently frozen on a different cluster node, in read-only mode. This patch makes read-only mounts lock the freeze glock in SH mode, which will block for file systems that are frozen on another node. Signed-off-by:
Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
-
Bob Peterson authored
Before this patch, function freeze_go_sync, called when promoting the freeze glock, was testing for the SDF_JOURNAL_LIVE superblock flag. That's only set for read-write mounts. Read-only mounts don't use a journal, so the bit is never set, so the freeze never happened. This patch removes the check for SDF_JOURNAL_LIVE for freeze requests but still checks it when deciding whether to flush a journal. Signed-off-by:
Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
-
Bob Peterson authored
In several places, we used the GIF_ORDERED inode flag to determine if an inode was on the ordered writes list. However, since we always held the sd_ordered_lock spin_lock during the manipulation, we can just as easily check list_empty(&ip->i_ordered) instead. This allows us to keep more than one ordered writes list to make journal writing improvements. This patch eliminates GIF_ORDERED in favor of checking list_empty. Signed-off-by:
Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
-
- Jul 02, 2020
-
-
Josef Bacik authored
Eric reported an issue where mounting -o recovery with a fuzzed fs resulted in a kernel panic. This is because we tried to free the tree node, except it was an error from the read. Fix this by properly resetting the tree_root->node == NULL in this case. The panic was the following BTRFS warning (device loop0): failed to read tree root BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000001f RIP: 0010:free_extent_buffer+0xe/0x90 [btrfs] Call Trace: free_root_extent_buffers.part.0+0x11/0x30 [btrfs] free_root_pointers+0x1a/0xa2 [btrfs] open_ctree+0x1776/0x18a5 [btrfs] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x13/0xfa [btrfs] ? selinux_fs_context_parse_param+0x37/0x80 legacy_get_tree+0x27/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x25/0xb0 fc_mount+0xe/0x30 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0x90 btrfs_mount+0x147/0x3e0 [btrfs] ? cred_has_capability+0x7c/0x120 ? legacy_get_tree+0x27/0x40 legacy_get_tree+0x27/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x25/0xb0 do_mount+0x735/0xa40 __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Nik says: this is problematic only if we fail on the last iteration of the loop as this results in init_tree_roots returning err value with tree_root->node = -ERR. Subsequently the caller does: fail_tree_roots which calls free_root_pointers on the bogus value. Reported-by:
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Fixes: b8522a1e ("btrfs: Factor out tree roots initialization during mount") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.5+ Reviewed-by:
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ add details how the pointer gets dereferenced ] Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
Commit 7f9fe614 ("btrfs: improve global reserve stealing logic"), added in the 5.8 merge window, introduced another leak for the space_info's reclaim_size counter. This is very often triggered by the test cases generic/269 and generic/416 from fstests, producing a stack trace like the following during unmount: [37079.155499] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [37079.156844] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2000423 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3422 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x2eb/0x300 [btrfs] [37079.158090] Modules linked in: dm_snapshot btrfs dm_thin_pool (...) [37079.164440] CPU: 2 PID: 2000423 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 5.7.0-rc7-btrfs-next-62 #1 [37079.165422] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), (...) [37079.167384] RIP: 0010:btrfs_free_block_groups+0x2eb/0x300 [btrfs] [37079.168375] Code: bd 58 ff ff ff 00 4c 8d (...) [37079.170199] RSP: 0018:ffffaa53875c7de0 EFLAGS: 00010206 [37079.171120] RAX: ffff98099e701cf8 RBX: ffff98099e2d4000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [37079.172057] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffffc0acc5b1 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [37079.173002] RBP: ffff98099e701cf8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [37079.173886] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff98099e701c00 [37079.174730] R13: ffff98099e2d5100 R14: dead000000000122 R15: dead000000000100 [37079.175578] FS: 00007f4d7d0a5840(0000) GS:ffff9809ec600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [37079.176434] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [37079.177289] CR2: 0000559224dcc000 CR3: 000000012207a004 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [37079.178152] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [37079.178935] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [37079.179675] Call Trace: [37079.180419] close_ctree+0x291/0x2d1 [btrfs] [37079.181162] generic_shutdown_super+0x6c/0x100 [37079.181898] kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 [37079.182641] btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] [37079.183371] deactivate_locked_super+0x31/0x70 [37079.184012] cleanup_mnt+0x100/0x160 [37079.184650] task_work_run+0x68/0xb0 [37079.185284] exit_to_usermode_loop+0xf9/0x100 [37079.185920] do_syscall_64+0x20d/0x260 [37079.186556] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3 [37079.187197] RIP: 0033:0x7f4d7d2d9357 [37079.187836] Code: eb 0b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 (...) [37079.189180] RSP: 002b:00007ffee4e0d368 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6 [37079.189845] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f4d7d3fb224 RCX: 00007f4d7d2d9357 [37079.190515] RDX: ffffffffffffff78 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000559224dc5c90 [37079.191173] RBP: 0000559224dc1970 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffee4e0c0e0 [37079.191815] R10: 0000559224dc7b00 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [37079.192451] R13: 0000559224dc5c90 R14: 0000559224dc1a80 R15: 0000559224dc1ba0 [37079.193096] irq event stamp: 0 [37079.193729] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [37079.194379] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff97ab8935>] copy_process+0x755/0x1ea0 [37079.195033] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff97ab8935>] copy_process+0x755/0x1ea0 [37079.195700] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [37079.196318] ---[ end trace b32710d864dea887 ]--- In the past commit d611add4 ("btrfs: fix reclaim counter leak of space_info objects") fixed similar cases. That commit however has a date more recent (April 7 2020) then the commit mentioned before (March 13 2020), however it was merged in kernel 5.7 while the older commit, which introduces a new leak, was merged only in the 5.8 merge window. So the leak sneaked in unnoticed. Fix this by making steal_from_global_rsv() remove the ticket using the helper remove_ticket(), which decrements the reclaim_size counter of the space_info object. Fixes: 7f9fe614 ("btrfs: improve global reserve stealing logic") Signed-off-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Boris Burkov authored
Under somewhat convoluted conditions, it is possible to attempt to release an extent_buffer that is under io, which triggers a BUG_ON in btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages. This relies on a few different factors. First, extent_buffer reads done as readahead for searching use WAIT_NONE, so they free the local extent buffer reference while the io is outstanding. However, they should still be protected by TREE_REF. However, if the system is doing signficant reclaim, and simultaneously heavily accessing the extent_buffers, it is possible for releasepage to race with two concurrent readahead attempts in a way that leaves TREE_REF unset when the readahead extent buffer is released. Essentially, if two tasks race to allocate a new extent_buffer, but the winner who attempts the first io is rebuffed by a page being locked (likely by the reclaim itself) then the loser will still go ahead with issuing the readahead. The loser's call to find_extent_buffer must also race with the reclaim task reading the extent_buffer's refcount as 1 in a way that allows the reclaim to re-clear the TREE_REF checked by find_extent_buffer. The following represents an example execution demonstrating the race: CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 reada_for_search reada_for_search readahead_tree_block readahead_tree_block find_create_tree_block find_create_tree_block alloc_extent_buffer alloc_extent_buffer find_extent_buffer // not found allocates eb lock pages associate pages to eb insert eb into radix tree set TREE_REF, refs == 2 unlock pages read_extent_buffer_pages // WAIT_NONE not uptodate (brand new eb) lock_page if !trylock_page goto unlock_exit // not an error free_extent_buffer release_extent_buffer atomic_dec_and_test refs to 1 find_extent_buffer // found try_release_extent_buffer take refs_lock reads refs == 1; no io atomic_inc_not_zero refs to 2 mark_buffer_accessed check_buffer_tree_ref // not STALE, won't take refs_lock refs == 2; TREE_REF set // no action read_extent_buffer_pages // WAIT_NONE clear TREE_REF release_extent_buffer atomic_dec_and_test refs to 1 unlock_page still not uptodate (CPU1 read failed on trylock_page) locks pages set io_pages > 0 submit io return free_extent_buffer release_extent_buffer dec refs to 0 delete from radix tree btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages BUG_ON(io_pages > 0)!!! We observe this at a very low rate in production and were also able to reproduce it in a test environment by introducing some spurious delays and by introducing probabilistic trylock_page failures. To fix it, we apply check_tree_ref at a point where it could not possibly be unset by a competing task: after io_pages has been incremented. All the codepaths that clear TREE_REF check for io, so they would not be able to clear it after this point until the io is done. Stack trace, for reference: [1417839.424739] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [1417839.435328] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4841! [1417839.447024] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP [1417839.502972] RIP: 0010:btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages+0x20/0x1f0 [1417839.517008] Code: ed e9 ... [1417839.558895] RSP: 0018:ffffc90020bcf798 EFLAGS: 00010202 [1417839.570816] RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff888102d6def0 RCX: 0000000000000028 [1417839.586962] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: ffff8887f0296482 RDI: ffff888102d6def0 [1417839.603108] RBP: ffff88885664a000 R08: 0000000000000046 R09: 0000000000000238 [1417839.619255] R10: 0000000000000028 R11: ffff88885664af68 R12: 0000000000000000 [1417839.635402] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88875f573ad0 R15: ffff888797aafd90 [1417839.651549] FS: 00007f5a844fa700(0000) GS:ffff88885f680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [1417839.669810] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [1417839.682887] CR2: 00007f7884541fe0 CR3: 000000049f609002 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [1417839.699037] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [1417839.715187] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [1417839.731320] Call Trace: [1417839.737103] release_extent_buffer+0x39/0x90 [1417839.746913] read_block_for_search.isra.38+0x2a3/0x370 [1417839.758645] btrfs_search_slot+0x260/0x9b0 [1417839.768054] btrfs_lookup_file_extent+0x4a/0x70 [1417839.778427] btrfs_get_extent+0x15f/0x830 [1417839.787665] ? submit_extent_page+0xc4/0x1c0 [1417839.797474] ? __do_readpage+0x299/0x7a0 [1417839.806515] __do_readpage+0x33b/0x7a0 [1417839.815171] ? btrfs_releasepage+0x70/0x70 [1417839.824597] extent_readpages+0x28f/0x400 [1417839.833836] read_pages+0x6a/0x1c0 [1417839.841729] ? startup_64+0x2/0x30 [1417839.849624] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x13c/0x1a0 [1417839.860590] filemap_fault+0x6c7/0x990 [1417839.869252] ? xas_load+0x8/0x80 [1417839.876756] ? xas_find+0x150/0x190 [1417839.884839] ? filemap_map_pages+0x295/0x3b0 [1417839.894652] __do_fault+0x32/0x110 [1417839.902540] __handle_mm_fault+0xacd/0x1000 [1417839.912156] handle_mm_fault+0xaa/0x1c0 [1417839.921004] __do_page_fault+0x242/0x4b0 [1417839.930044] ? page_fault+0x8/0x30 [1417839.937933] page_fault+0x1e/0x30 [1417839.945631] RIP: 0033:0x33c4bae [1417839.952927] Code: Bad RIP value. [1417839.960411] RSP: 002b:00007f5a844f7350 EFLAGS: 00010206 [1417839.972331] RAX: 000000000000006e RBX: 1614b3ff6a50398a RCX: 0000000000000000 [1417839.988477] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000002 [1417840.004626] RBP: 00007f5a844f7420 R08: 000000000000006e R09: 00007f5a94aeccb8 [1417840.020784] R10: 00007f5a844f7350 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00007f5a94aecc79 [1417840.036932] R13: 00007f5a94aecc78 R14: 00007f5a94aecc90 R15: 00007f5a94aecc40 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Marcos Paulo de Souza authored
Convert fall through comments to the pseudo-keyword which is now the preferred way. Signed-off-by:
Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Ronnie Sahlberg authored
The wait_event_... defines evaluate to long so we should not assign it an int as this may truncate the value. Reported-by:
Marshall Midden <marshallmidden@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
-
Zhang Xiaoxu authored
When xfstest generic/035, we found the target file was deleted if the rename return -EACESS. In cifs_rename2, we unlink the positive target dentry if rename failed with EACESS or EEXIST, even if the target dentry is positived before rename. Then the existing file was deleted. We should just delete the target file which created during the rename. Reported-by:
Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by:
Aurelien Aptel <aaptel@suse.com>
-