- Sep 11, 2011
-
-
Li Zefan authored
You can see there's no file extent with range [0, 4096]. Check this by btrfsck: # btrfsck /dev/sda7 root 5 inode 258 errors 100 ... Signed-off-by:
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
Li Zefan authored
num_bytes should be 4096 not 12288. Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
An attribute is not removed by 'setfattr -x attr file' and remains visible in attr list. This makes xfstests/062 pass again. Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
If we write some data into the data hole of the file(no preallocation for this hole), Btrfs will allocate some disk space, and update nbytes of the inode, but the other element--disk_i_size needn't be updated. At this condition, we must update inode metadata though disk_i_size is not changed(btrfs_ordered_update_i_size() return 1). # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb1 # mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt # touch /mnt/a # truncate -s 856002 /mnt/a # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/a bs=4K count=1 conv=nocreat,notrunc # umount /mnt # btrfsck /dev/sdb1 root 5 inode 257 errors 400 found 32768 bytes used err is 1 Signed-off-by:
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
When we write some data to the place that is beyond the end of the file in direct I/O mode, a data hole will be created. And Btrfs should insert a file extent item that point to this hole into the fs tree. But unfortunately Btrfs forgets doing it. The following is a simple way to reproduce it: # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdc2 # mount /dev/sdc2 /test4 # touch /test4/a # dd if=/dev/zero of=/test4/a seek=8 count=1 bs=4K oflag=direct conv=nocreat,notrunc # umount /test4 # btrfsck /dev/sdc2 root 5 inode 257 errors 100 Reported-by:
Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
The function - btrfs_cont_expand() forgot to close the transaction handle before it jump out the while loop. Fix it. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
At the beginning of create_pending_snapshot, trans->block_rsv is set to pending->block_rsv and is used for snapshot things, however, when it is done, we do not recover it as will. Signed-off-by:
Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
While truncating free space cache, we forget to change trans->block_rsv back to the original one, but leave it with the orphan_block_rsv, and then with option inode_cache enable, it leads to countless warnings of btrfs_alloc_free_block and btrfs_orphan_commit_root: WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5711 btrfs_alloc_free_block+0x180/0x350 [btrfs]() ... WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2193 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0xb0/0xc0 [btrfs]() Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
It's not enough to just search the commit root, since we could be cow'ing the very block we need to search through, which would mean that its locked and we'll still deadlock. So use path->skip_locking as well. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Sergei Trofimovich authored
iput() shouldn't be called for inodes in I_NEW state. We need to mark inode as constructed first. WARNING: at fs/inode.c:1309 iput+0x20b/0x210() Call Trace: [<ffffffff8103e7ba>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xb0 [<ffffffff8103e805>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x20 [<ffffffff810eaf0b>] iput+0x20b/0x210 [<ffffffff811b96fb>] btrfs_iget+0x1eb/0x4a0 [<ffffffff811c3ad6>] btrfs_run_defrag_inodes+0x136/0x210 [<ffffffff811ad55f>] cleaner_kthread+0x17f/0x1a0 [<ffffffff81035b7d>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x9d/0xd0 [<ffffffff811ad3e0>] ? transaction_kthread+0x280/0x280 [<ffffffff8105af86>] kthread+0x96/0xa0 [<ffffffff814336d4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [<ffffffff8105aef0>] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x190/0x190 [<ffffffff814336d0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb Signed-off-by:
Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org> CC: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org> Tested-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
We can reproduce this oops via the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb7 $ mount /dev/sdb7 /mnt/btrfs $ for ((i=0; i<3; i++)); do btrfs sub snap /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/s_$i; done $ rm -fr /mnt/btrfs/* $ rm -fr /mnt/btrfs/* then we'll get ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2264! [...] Call Trace: [<ffffffffa05578c7>] btrfs_rmdir+0xf7/0x1b0 [btrfs] [<ffffffff81150b95>] vfs_rmdir+0xa5/0xf0 [<ffffffff81153cc3>] do_rmdir+0x123/0x140 [<ffffffff81145ac7>] ? fput+0x197/0x260 [<ffffffff810aecff>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x1bf/0x1f0 [<ffffffff81153d0d>] sys_unlinkat+0x2d/0x40 [<ffffffff8147896b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b RIP [<ffffffffa054f7b9>] btrfs_orphan_add+0x179/0x1a0 [btrfs] When it comes to btrfs_lookup_dentry, we may set a snapshot's inode->i_ino to BTRFS_EMPTY_SUBVOL_DIR_OBJECTID instead of BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID, while the snapshot's location.objectid remains unchanged. However, btrfs_ino() does not take this into account, and returns a wrong ino, and causes the oops. Signed-off-by:
-
- Aug 18, 2011
-
-
Josef Bacik authored
xfstests exposed a problem with preallocate when it fallocates a range that already has an extent. We don't set the new i_size properly because we see that we already have an extent. This isn't right and we should update i_size if the space already exists. With this patch we now pass xfstests 075. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
- Aug 17, 2011
-
-
Sage Weil authored
We need to truncate page cache pages for the clone ioctl target range or else we'll confuse ourselves to no end. If the old data was cached, we used to still see it (until remount). If the page was partially updated we used to get a mix of old and new data. Signed-off-by:
Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
sync_pending is uninitialized before it be used, fix it. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
Btrfs subtracted the size of the allocated space twice when it allocated the space from the bitmap in the cluster, it broke the free space information and led to oops finally. And this patch also fixes the bug that ctl->free_space was subtracted without lock. Reported-by:
-
Dan Carpenter authored
We don't use the defrag struct on this path. Signed-off-by:
Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Li Zefan authored
We've stopped using highmem for extent buffers. Signed-off-by:
-
Tsutomu Itoh authored
The filesystem turns readonly instead of returning the error to the caller when detected error in btrfs_drop_snapshot(). and, because the caller doesn't check the error, the function type is changed to 'void'. Signed-off-by:
-
liubo authored
When checking if there is enough space for balancing a block group, since we do not take raid types into consideration, we do not account corrent amounts of space that we needed. This makes us do some extra work before we get ENOSPC. Signed-off-by:
-
liubo authored
When balancing, we'll first try to shrink devices for some space, but if it is working on a full multi-disk partition with raid protection, we may encounter a bug, that is, while shrinking, total_bytes may be less than bytes_used, and btrfs may allocate a dev extent that accesses out of device's bounds. Then we will not be able to write or read the data which stores at the end of the device, and get the followings: device fsid 0939f071-7ea3-46c8-95df-f176d773bfb6 devid 1 transid 10 /dev/sdb5 Btrfs detected SSD devices, enabling SSD mode btrfs: relocating block group 476315648 flags 9 btrfs: found 4 extents attempt to access beyond end of device sdb5: rw=145, want=546176, limit=546147 attempt to access beyond end of device sdb5: rw=145, want=546304, limit=546147 attempt to access beyond end of device sdb5: rw=145, want=546432, limit=546147 attempt to access beyond end of device sdb5: rw=145, want=546560, limit=546147 attempt to access beyond end of device Signed-off-by:
-
liubo authored
When btrfs recovers from a crash, it may hit the oops below: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:4580! [...] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa03df251>] [<ffffffffa03df251>] btrfs_add_link+0x161/0x1c0 [btrfs] [...] Call Trace: [<ffffffffa03e7b31>] ? btrfs_inode_ref_index+0x31/0x80 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa04054e9>] add_inode_ref+0x319/0x3f0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0407087>] replay_one_buffer+0x2c7/0x390 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa040444a>] walk_down_log_tree+0x32a/0x480 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0404695>] walk_log_tree+0xf5/0x240 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0406cc0>] btrfs_recover_log_trees+0x250/0x350 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0406dc0>] ? btrfs_recover_log_trees+0x350/0x350 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa03d18b2>] open_ctree+0x1442/0x17d0 [btrfs] [...] This comes from that while replaying an inode ref item, we forget to check those old conflicting DIR_ITEM and DIR_INDEX items in fs/file tree, then we will come to conflict corners which lead to BUG_ON(). Signed-off-by:
Andy Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We have a problem where if a user specifies discard but doesn't actually support it we will return EOPNOTSUPP from btrfs_discard_extent. This is a problem because this gets called (in a fashion) from the tree log recovery code, which has a nice little BUG_ON(ret) after it, which causes us to fail the tree log replay. So instead detect wether our devices support discard when we're adding them and then don't issue discards if we know that the device doesn't support it. And just for good measure set ret = 0 in btrfs_issue_discard just in case we still get EOPNOTSUPP so we don't screw anybody up like this again. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
- Aug 05, 2011
-
-
Chris Mason authored
Btrfs does bio submissions from a worker thread, and each device has a list of high priority bios and regular priority bios. Synchronous writes go to the high priority thread while async writes go to regular list. This commit brings back an explicit unplug any time we switch from high to regular priority, which makes it easier for the block layer to give us low latencies. Signed-off-by:
-
- Aug 01, 2011
-
-
Josef Bacik authored
When doing a writepage we call writepages to try and write out any other dirty pages in the area. This could cause problems where we commit a transaction and then have somebody else dirtying metadata in the area as we could end up writing out a lot more than we care about, which could cause latency on anybody who is waiting for the transaction to completely finish committing. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Mitch Harder authored
The variable 'last_index' is calculated in the __btrfs_buffered_write function and passed as a parameter to the prepare_pages function, but is not used anywhere in the prepare_pages function. Remove instances of 'last_index' in these functions. Signed-off-by:
Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Xiao Guangrong authored
find_first_extent_bit() and find_first_extent_bit_state() share most of the code, and we can just make the former call the latter. Signed-off-by:
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Xiao Guangrong authored
We can just use cond_resched_lock(). Signed-off-by:
-
Xiao Guangrong authored
Don't duplicate set_state_bits(). Signed-off-by:
-
Xiao Guangrong authored
These members are not used at all. Signed-off-by:
-
Li Zefan authored
unpin_extent_cache() and add_extent_mapping() shares the same code that merges extent maps. Signed-off-by:
-
Li Zefan authored
lookup_extent_map() and search_extent_map() can share most of code. Signed-off-by:
-
Li Zefan authored
rb_node returned by __tree_search() can be a valid pointer or NULL, but won't be some errno. Signed-off-by:
-
Li Zefan authored
When we search a dir item with a specific hash code, we can just return NULL without further checking if btrfs_search_slot() returns 1. Signed-off-by:
-
Li Zefan authored
So there's no overhead for something we don't use. Signed-off-by:
-
Li Zefan authored
Since commit f2a97a9d ("btrfs: remove all unused functions"), there's no extern functions at all in ref-cache.c, so just remove the remaining dead code. Signed-off-by:
-
Li Zefan authored
wait_for_commit() always returns 0. Signed-off-by:
-
Li Zefan authored
Use wait_event() when possible to avoid code duplication. Signed-off-by:
-
Li Zefan authored
If mounting with nodatasum option, we won't csum file data for general write or direct-io write, and this rule should also be applied when writing compressed files. Signed-off-by:
-
Li Zefan authored
Memory areas [ptr, ptr+total_len] and [name, name+total_len] may overlap, so it's wrong to use memcpy(). Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
In __btrfs_free_extent we will print the leaf if we fail to find the extent we wanted, but the problem is if we get an error we won't have a leaf so often this leads to a NULL pointer dereference and we lose the error that actually occurred. So only print the leaf if ret > 0, which means we didn't find the item we were looking for but we didn't error either. This way the error is preserved. Signed-off-by:
-
